Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lurking Libertarian
There is a motion to dismiss the California case pending. Orly hasn't responded to it yet. (She has 4 more days). No eligibility case has survived a motion to dismiss yet.

Kreep the other lawyer wrote the response:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/19759149/KEYES-v-OBAMA-64-OPPOSITION-TO-APPLICATION-FOR-LIMITED-STAY-OF-DISCOVERY-Govuscourtscacd435591640

126 posted on 09/16/2009 12:22:14 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]


To: Red Steel; pissant

No, Kreep responded to the motion to stay discovery. No one has responded to the motion to dismiss yet. (They still have time, though.)


128 posted on 09/16/2009 12:24:55 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

To: Red Steel
Kreep the other lawyer wrote the response:

And Kreep specifically says there that he's writing on behalf of his two clients only, and not on behalf of Taitz or her clients. Orly still needs to respond on behalf of her clients, who have different interests.
130 posted on 09/16/2009 12:28:16 PM PDT by Sibre Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

To: Red Steel
Kreep the other lawyer wrote the response...

So when's Orly going to respond? Since she's representing the lion's share of the plaintiffs then shouldn't she be submitting something on their behalf? It's due Monday.

146 posted on 09/16/2009 1:01:59 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson