To: Nathan Zachary
But, it wasn't 2.4 billion light years away 6,000 years ago.If that were the case, then the quasars should appear less than 6,000 light years away, even though they're now 2.4 billion light years away. Unfortunately for your side, they don't.
22 posted on
09/16/2009 9:37:45 AM PDT by
Alter Kaker
(Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
To: Alter Kaker
"If that were the case, then the quasars should appear less than 6,000 light years away, even though they're now 2.4 billion light years away. Unfortunately for your side, they don't." Not so. You are assuming light speed was always constant, as was and is the expansion of the universe. It couldn't have been.
To: Alter Kaker
It's really hard to keep a straight face on these threads.... but they are entertaining.
34 posted on
09/16/2009 9:58:12 AM PDT by
mgstarr
("Some of us drink because we're not poets." Arthur (1981))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson