>>Yes, and dont forget that ‘young’ star-light that was created to ‘look’ like ‘old’ star-light, billions of years old.<<
I did not see starlight discussed in this article. I believe they were trying to consider what the raw evidence would suggest.
My point is that if you promote the idea that time speeds up and slows down to meet some Biblical creation timeline that conflicts with the evil Darwinists timeline, maybe accusing THEM (geologists in this case) of creating a fictional timeline to support their (evolutionists in this case) evolution ideas is not a good idea.
It would look better for creationists if it were those dishonest Darwinists speeding up and slowing down time to meet THEIR timeline. Maybe this could be refined before we throw it at 9th graders in public schools. Maybe creationists could poll this theory like they do creation vs evolution, or is it like the Health reform plan, popular as long as no one knows what in it??
So does all this mean the Moon is further away than evolutionists claim too? How about my commute to work?