Since you claim to be a commander, your performance shows just what kind of CYA we can expect from ‘commanders’.
You say whatever you want, talk out of both sides of your mouth and (when you get caught) expect everybody to ignore your dis ingenuousness while you call for ‘facts’. I don’t need a crystal ball to see through that.
That might appear to work in the military where you can just tell people to shut up, but you aren’t fooling anybody.
You say whatever you want, talk out of both sides of your mouth and (when you get caught) expect everybody to ignore your dis ingenuousness while you call for ‘facts’. I don’t need a crystal ball to see through that.
That might appear to work in the military where you can just tell people to shut up, but you aren’t fooling anybody.
I'll assume at this point that you can't back up your claim, but will continue with the same "back against the wall" diatribe. There's no sense in responding to me again. I won't return the favor, other than to say this: The article 15-6 and/or article 32 investigation that comes from this incident will let the chips fall where they may. That's why we commanders have those UCMJ tools. We don't deal in rumors and innuendo of fact.