This is a load of crap.Where is the opinion on mcnutts?They cant pass up a chance to bash her.
IMHO, Without Palin, McStain would not have done nearly as well as he did.
The people voted for Sarah, not McPain.
All of these polished, pampered, political pigs with their Ivy League educations get all wee-wee’d up in the glare of a woman that can gut a grizzly.
Clearly, ZerO has less of a clue than the clueless TOTUS.
I miss the clarity of Charlie McCarthy.
Already posted and has been debunked with links.
LLS
I wholeheartedly agree with that...However, I like Palin's version of a GNP far better than I cared for Bush's GOP...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2340633/posts
(Debunk:) First on the Ticker: Bush, Palin aide disputes book claims
CNN Political Ticker. ^ | September 15th, 2009 02:22 PM ET Peter Hamby
Posted on Tuesday, September 15, 2009 8:08:47 PM by Clyde5445
A former aide to George W. Bush and Sarah Palin is dismissing a claim by onetime Bush speechwriter Matt Latimer that the former president was clueless about Palin when she was tapped as John McCain’s running mate last August. ... But Jason Recher, who served as special assistant to President Bush and as a traveling aide to Palin during the campaign, said the former President was well aware of Palin — especially since the two met in person in Alaska just three weeks before Palin was added to the Republican ticket.
“Bush considered Barack Obama unfit for the White House and predicted that vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin would be a disaster for the GOP.”
What do we have after eight years of Bush.......a rush to a socialist/communist government. Let’s face it Bush was no Reagan and his constantly “turning the other cheek” was a disaster. Sarah is a woman of principle ie, Maggie Thatcher, and will return freedom to the nation.
Sarah Palin was ten times better than daddy Bushes pick of Dan Quayle.