Precisely.
Some posters here have erroneously said: "There are only two kinds of citizens: natural-born and naturalized" (and then they often go on to say that born on American soil = citizen at birth = natural born).
They are mistaken.
It is true there are only two kinds of citizens.
However, those two kinds are:
citizen by NATURE (i.e. natural born); and
citizen by STATUTE (this includes naturalized and those "citizens from birth" born on the nation's soil).
A citizen by nature is natural-born, he is undisputedly and undoubtedly a citizen, he needs NO statute of any kind to explain or clarify his citizenship.
It's so simple, and yet so many posters here seem to misunderstand this.
>>> A citizen by nature is natural-born, he is undisputedly and undoubtedly a citizen, he needs NO statute of any kind to explain or clarify his citizenship.
Not true.
Not only must one be born on US soil, but BOTH parents must be US citizens.
Even if Obama was born in Hawaii, he still doesn’t qualify as natural born, because his father was not a US citizen.