The tried and successful ‘no standing’ argument rephrased to fool the California judge. These arrogant bastards really think he’s cowardly enough to slink away at their invitation! I sincerely pray that Judge Carter reads this ridiculous plea fro what it is, an open insult to him and the Constitution ... since when is a criminal exhonerated because you didn’t catch him when he says you had to? I mean, this smacks of ‘uh oh stupid, you didn’t get in under the statute of limitations so you can’t even hear the case, judge pipsqueak.’
Since they are refering to a provision within the Constitution itself, ANYONE who has taken an oath to "support this Constitution" has the legal standing to challenge whether or not a portion of it is being enforced. Otherwise they would not be obeying their oath. Here is the listing from within the oath itself in Article six:
” The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.”
Judge Carter is among those covered. I hope they pissed him off good!