Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: so_real

The Commander in Chief is a CIVILIAN, not a military officer. That is the way it was set up from the get-go. We have CIVILIAN control over our armed forces. Unlike where the Prince of Wales is also Colonel-in-Chief of a regiment over there and wears a uniform, here there is no such thing.


189 posted on 09/16/2009 10:18:41 PM PDT by dcwusmc (We need to make government so small that it can be drowned in a bathtub.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]


To: dcwusmc

Agreed. The Commander in Chief is a civilian without question. However, I believe in the eyes of the Supreme Law, he is titled a "civilian officer", along with the Secretary of War et al, vis-a-vis United States v. Burns (1870). Perhaps I'm overreaching, but I do think the U.S. CODE pertaining to civilian impersonation of an officer applies as the CiC is a civilian officer and beyond that the highest ranking officer in the entire military body.


192 posted on 09/17/2009 7:53:19 AM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson