Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Foreign Policy: 'No We Can't'? [Reduced To Tin-Pot Democracy Under A Year!]
BBCNews ^ | September 15, 2009

Posted on 09/15/2009 1:13:32 PM PDT by Steelfish

US Foreign Policy: 'No We Can't'?

By Paul Reynolds BBC News, World Affairs correspondent

President Obama has been seeking out new ways of engaging other countries

Stand by for some new buzz phrases to describe what is going on in international relations as the first year of the Obama administration unfolds.

"Bundles of co-operation", "coalitions of the relevant" and "minilateralism" are some key ones. "Engagement" is another.

This new jargon is used as a kind of shorthand to portray the reinvigorated form of diplomacy that the United States is now pursuing, as it moves from being the only superpower to being the main player in a game in which others take part.

The phrases are used in the latest edition of the annual Strategic Survey, issued by the London think tank the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS).

In analysing how a "weakened" United States should lower its sights and try to form regional groupings to help it, the IISS Director General Dr John Chipman said: "Domestically, [President] Obama may have campaigned on the theme 'yes we can'; internationally he may increasingly have to argue 'no we can't'".

Iran is likely to test the theory of 'no drama Obama'

Another IISS analyst transferred a campaign description of Barack Obama into the foreign field and said he might become known as "no drama Obama".

(Excerpt) Read more at news.bbc.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 09/15/2009 1:13:32 PM PDT by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

“new jargon is used as a kind of shorthand to portray the reinvigorated form of diplomacy”

It’s just jargon to disguise the massive failure of his foreign policy.


2 posted on 09/15/2009 1:15:40 PM PDT by texmexis best
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

That SOB is bent on destroying our nation inside and out. With every fiber of my being, I hate that ba*tard.


3 posted on 09/15/2009 1:16:55 PM PDT by ScottinVA (This Revolution will be peaceful if possible; other than peaceful if necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: Steelfish

Unfortunately this was entirely predictable, and indeed predicted by many.


5 posted on 09/15/2009 1:19:36 PM PDT by cvq3842 (I don't ask what my country can do for me - I ask my government to STOP doing things TO me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

more like an empty “Jiffy-Pop” popcorn pan.


6 posted on 09/15/2009 1:20:17 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

America’s founders realized the only real protection from someone who wanted to take over WAS THE PEOPLE. They said it many times in the Federalist Papers and in many famous quotes.

For way too long we have sat complacent while the prison was built around us.

The founders realized there was no government structure which could prevent tyranny from within — And the only thing that prevented a tyrannical executive, the character of the executive. One word you will never associate with Obama.


7 posted on 09/15/2009 1:21:57 PM PDT by Tarpon (The Joker's plan -- Slavery by debt so large it can never be repaid...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

In my world, “bundles of cooperation” are infants who finally begin sleeping through the night. Our government has been handed over to weenies.


8 posted on 09/15/2009 1:25:40 PM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

At least most of you had a chance to live in America. Obama is going to take us out before I get a chance (I’m still in High School.) At least from what I can see, a lot of people my age are beginning to realize that Obama is bankrupting us in the future.


9 posted on 09/15/2009 2:57:17 PM PDT by TypicalWhiteAdolescent (2010 is comin' round, and liberal dems are goin down!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cvq3842
"Unfortunately this was entirely predictable"

Correct, Obama ran on the Realist/Pragmatist foreign policy doctrine, and his foreign policy goals were endorsed by many republican Realists. Can you recall which Republican Realist actually voted for Obama? Colin Powell.

OTOH, McCain ran on the NeoCon foreign policy doctrine and lost. Can you recall which republican Realist, who was a paid consultant to the McCain campaign, actually endorsed Obama's plans to negotiate with Iran? Henry Kissinger.

10 posted on 09/15/2009 5:19:36 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson