Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eva
Some of the prosecutor firings were because the prosecutors refused to bring RICO charges against ACORN for voter fraud. Instead they chose to prosecute the low level employees and assess a small fine on the ACORN office.

The Bush prosecutor firings? And we DON'T want hearings into that?

237 posted on 09/15/2009 3:54:14 PM PDT by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies ]


To: Dianna
It took me a minute to understand what you meant. Yeah,some of the Bush federal prosecutor firings were for failing to prosecutoe ACORN.

The Democrats aren't interested in the reasons for the firings, they are only interested in gaining access to protected communications between the Attorney General's office, Cheney and Rove. They want to prove that Rove instigated the firings as part of a political vendetta. They wouldn't even allow any testimony on the real reason for the firings, just on who instigated it.

One of the federal prosecutors, who refused to prosecute ACORN, was here in WA state. ACORN handed the governorship to Christine Gregoire on the third recount. The prosecutor claimed that he did not have evidence of a conspiracy because he had no tapes or any evidence that the cheating was planned.

243 posted on 09/15/2009 6:28:31 PM PDT by Eva (Obama bin Lyin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson