[Tempest]

Ordinarily she would have as much right to due process as any other immigrant in violation to the terms of her stay...

Now i’ve been posting here for a long time mind you, so why don’t you take a wild guess as to what the popular opinion is for due process to immigrants in violation of their stay.

Try posing the question and presenting the immigrant as an Abdullah or an Ochoa and tell me your reaction...

But I digress...

In response to your question. Due process is afforded to those whom guilt ha not yet been established. It is clear in this case that the law requires her to take the shot as a condition of her stay. Her reasons for exemption does not guarantee the general safety of the public nor is it just cause to make her an exception when everyone else in her status is required to do it.

Hence willfull violation as to the terms of her stay.

I think that this is crystal clear.

[TigersEye]

A crock full of sophistry. She hasn't violated any law or regulation at this point. That is clear from the article. She has the right to contest the law the same as anyone.

As for your bigoted opinion of FReepers ... I don't share it. Go troll some other forum with your race-baiting.

[Grizzled Bear]

Her reasons for exemption does not guarantee the general safety of the public nor is it just cause to make her an exception when everyone else in her status is required to do it.

Are you frightened that her vagina might attack someone?