We couldn't get a winnable candidate to agree with the base on even 50% of the issues. Let's take a look:
John McLame - McAmnesty, Pro Teddy Kennedy, compromiser-in-chief....need I say more?
Guiliani and Romney....WTH......we really contemplated nominating two northeastern liberals that were both pro choice and one of them (Romney) signed socialized healthcare into law in Massachusetts.
Freddy: I like Fred Thompson, but he had to actually ask for his own applause at one of his "rallies" because the man was such a bore. I don't think he ever really wanted it anyways.
Duncan Hunter: I don't know much about his except that he is supposedly a true conservative. But his problem is that NOBODY knew much about him.
Huckabee: If you were going for electability, he was our only hope. However, although far to the right of Rudy, Mitt, and McLame, he was still a tad too liberal. But, I would have punched the ticket for him had he been nominated.
Ron Paul: He was the only guy who understood the true intentions of our forefathers and is VERY PRINCIPLED. He even voted against hurricane relief in his own district because of his constitutional convictions. His only problem, I believe, is that a lot of "alternative" kooks came out in support of him and the GOP used them against him, despite Ron Paul being the true small-government conservative.