Well, there is a difference, isn’t there ? Saying otherwise is hyperbolic, not realistic.
You wouldn’t have seen a cap&trade bill, or a “stimulus” bill of that sort (though there probably would have been something), or a medical insurance bill under a Republican Congress in 2009.
As for Nixon vs McGovern, that was for Nixons 2nd term. How could you have permitted McGovern to get in ?
“You wouldn’t have seen a cap&trade bill, or a “stimulus” bill of that sort (though there probably would have been something), or a medical insurance bill under a Republican Congress in 2009.”
NCLB and Medicare Part D were passed by a Republican Congress, were they not? When HillaryCare was first proposed, did our “leaders” in the GOP oppose it on principle? No. They proposed their own slightly-less-bad version. Your assumption that those three bills would not have been passed by a Republican Congress - for a Republican President - is not in evidence. It’s all about the Party, not the Principle with these people.
“As for Nixon vs McGovern, that was for Nixons 2nd term. How could you have permitted McGovern to get in ?”
Both libs. It has to end somewhere.