How is pointing out that the Darwinistas are motivated by an anti-science, evo-religious creation myth an argumentum ad hominem?
Because you provided absolutely no evidence to refute my assertion, just name-calling and misdirection, and that my friend is a textbook example of argumentum ad hominem
Please show me the evidence you cited to show that this statement is incorrect?
“if the specific mutation provides a benefit that increases the chance of survival that mutation is more likely to be passed down to future generations.”
You provided zero creditable empirical evidence to support your anti-science claims just name-calling, and misdirection.
This is the very reason that your “arguments” would completely and utterly fail outside of your echo chamber here and the reason you refuse to even attempt to try.
Talk is cheap.