Get the U.S. Out of the U. N and the U. N. Out of the U. S.

Canada Free Press ^ | September 13, 2009 | Jerry McConnell

[IbJensen]

As stated in previous columns here, the first thing good, honest Americans must do is to take back Congress in 2010. No small chore, but signs point to this being the opportune time to do it. And this change will be good for the country as opposed to the current disaster.

Congress is in the midst of one of its most contentious periods; the Democrat Party is in shambles, divided between the anti-American, anti-Christian liberal factions and what’s left of the party’s once honest and truly for the working class citizens of this country, very small as it may be, non-liberals.

Republicans have a fair-sized group of RINO’s, Republicans In Name Only, who are sort of stuck in the middle of the battle between the ultra left wing liberals and the conservatives, of both parties, but primarily tagged as Republicans.

Any takeover should be done at the expense of Democrat liberals and Republican RINO’s. To rid that legislative body of the scourge of those two elements, replaced by solid God and country loving conservatives would be a highly favorable condition to return to the days when our elected representatives agreed to serve the country’s needs above all other considerations; quite often on a wide bipartisan basis.

After removal, or at least downsizing the liberals to a powerless and ineffective group, the next target should be to isolate and render harmless to our country, the current Executive Administration. This treacherous and corrupt organization is not worth one penny of our money, nor one gram of our air.

[IbJensen]

Moderates and RINO’s would be on their own, with both feet planted firmly, one on each side of the political fence unable to decide.

Whenever I hear that a so-called Republican is 'moderate' I immediately understand that person does stand for anything!

Whenever the MSM assigns the term 'moderate Democrat' that means that the ACU rating is above 10 and the 'moderate' is a socialist!

[HuntsvilleTxVeteran]

Does anybody else wonder why we still support the UN?
It tries to undermine the Constitution of the USA and
would love to cripple our Constitutional Republic.

In over 60 years the only politicians who tried to get
the USA out of the UN were Goldwater and President
Ronald Reagan who did kick UNESCO out.
**
Ex-President GW Bush invited UNESCO back in 2002.
***

16 out of 17 of the AMERICANS that were involved
in creating the UN were later identified, in sworn
testimony, as secret communist agents.

The first Secretary General was the AMERICAN Alger Hiss.
Alger Hiss served time in prison pursuant to his
involvement in a Communist spy ring.

Many of the other AMERICANS that were involved in
creating the UN fled the country, to avoid prosecution.

The ONE AMERICAN, that was involved in creating the UN;
and was NOT later identified, in sworn testimony, as a
secret communist agent, was Dean Acheson.
Dean Acheson’s law firm was the legal representative of
the Soviet Union, in US courts.

If the AMERICANS that were involved in creating the UN
were Communists, what do you think we got from the rest
of the world?

[Nathan Zachary]

One of the biggest threats to the nation there is is the selling out of our sovereignty and subversion of our constitution to the UN. It is imperative that this nation server all agreements with the Un that give control over our sovereignty to NGO and UN international policies, as well as those that subvert constitutional law for UN human rights law.

[supremedoctrine]

The title of this thread, lest anyone forget, should ALSO
be one of the centerpieces of our new movement. It’s all part of the whole. For a million reasons, we don’t need them, they need us. And it would be wonderful to see if their ways could be mended over time, if we removed ourselves completely from their midst, and returned them to the institutionalized corruption ( this time let them feed on themselves) they so richly deserve.

[UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide]

I advocate staying in the UN in order to veto any consensus against us. (Remember the USSR walkout in 1950.) But then ignore it. If France is not going to declare war on the US, what difference does its Security Council vote against us matter?

[IbJensen]

The title of the thread has been the mantra of the John Birch Society for decades.

[IbJensen]

I wonder if a candidate could arise who would run on a platform to get us out of this evil entanglement?

[Little Ray]

Without the US enforce its “consensus” or pay to implement it, who would care what they UN votes? Sent it to Haiti. Or Somalia. Or some other UN enabled hellhole.

[Dick Bachert]

Freedom has an address:

http://www.jbs.org

Some essential history if you are to fully grasp the rot – and the plot — at the core of this thoroughly corrupt gaggle of over-educated morons for whom Obamessiah is the poster boy:

ORIGINS OF THE UN, PART 1:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAzl21AfnZU

ORIGINS OF THE UN, PART 2:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0qV2OM8ajQ

ORIGINS OF THE UN, PART 3:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VrkshIXYiPs

[o_zarkman44]

UN= United Nobodys.

Obama plans to cower to weak, bananna republics and let them dictate American economics and law.

We don’t answer to peons Obama...INCLUDING YOU!

[Dick Bachert]

The leftist media waged a full scale WAR on those crazy Birchers starting back in the late 50s. Thanks to that campaign, the JBS was made a radioactive laughing stock among the quiche-eating chattering classes. Some Americans NOT in the chattering classes also laughed at those silly old Birchers. Now that the socialists about whom those nutty Birchers were warning us have invaded Washington, most of them have STOPPED LAUGHING.

Oh, and have you also noticed that this same media that hammered those goofy, tinfoil hat wearing Birchers back then are now fully OUT OF THEIR LITTLE CLOSETS and IN FULL CRY FOR SOCIALISM HERE?

Gee, LOOKS LIKE THE BIRCHERS WERE RIGHT!

FREEDOM STILL HAS AN ADDRESS:

It’s http://www.jbs.org

[TXnMA]

[LoneStarC]

Check your facts....

“The first Secretary General [of UN] was Alger Hiss” — where did that come from?

The first Secretary General was Trygve Lie of Norway followed by Dag Hammarskjöld of Sweden.

Your position that we should get out of the UN and banish it from using us as a headquarters is right on.

More important than the names of UN Secretary Generals is their home nations. Other than the temporary “acting” Secretary from the founding until the first election, Gladwyn Jebb [Oct1945-Feb 1946] who was English - not a single one has been from a major “first world” nation or a nation that contributes significant funds to the UN.

Trygve Lie - Norway
Dag Hammarskjöld -Sweden
U Thant -Burma
Kurt Waldheim -Austria
Javier Perez de Cuéllar -Peru
Boutros Boutros-Ghali -Egypt
Kofi Annan -Ghana
Ban Ki-moon -South Korea

If Obama succeeds in converting America to a Marxist dictatorship, maybe we will see a UN Secretary from here. But then it wouldn’t matter anymore, would it?

One of the less quoted, but I think very significant undercurrents in Obama’s pre-election rhetoric was his intent to bring his version of “change” not only to us, but to the people of the world. Think of the fun of “spreading our wealth” not only from sea to shining sea, but around the world.......