Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MHGinTN
I would bet a glock.

Why would a Glock be more unlikely than a revolver?

66 posted on 09/11/2009 1:07:38 PM PDT by Eaker (If you have a problem and If explosives are an option then explosives are THE answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Eaker

Because Glocks suck?


68 posted on 09/11/2009 1:08:48 PM PDT by Snurple (VEGETARIAN, OLD INDIAN WORD FOR BAD HUNTER.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: Eaker
Easier to have a ND with a Glock that has one in the tube when it involves wannabe thugs ie: always carry holstered. Glocks are good weapons but unforgiving of bad handling. This moron probably would have shot himself if he was carrying a blackpowder muzzle loader.
83 posted on 09/11/2009 1:18:06 PM PDT by Polynikes (Viene una tormenta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: Eaker

If the weapon was chambered, reaching to retrieve it from inside the underwear could cause it to discharge when an ‘insensitive’ finger depressed the trigger.


94 posted on 09/11/2009 1:49:55 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Dems, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson