To: GOPsterinMA; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; Impy; Norman Bates; justiceseeker93; ...
Card isn’t my choice. He’s way too much the Washington insider.
2 posted on
09/10/2009 11:28:48 AM PDT by
Clintonfatigued
(Liberal sacred cows make great hamburger)
To: Clintonfatigued
Yeah, but isn’t he about the closest thing you could get to a conservative out of Massachusetts? I know he’s a RINO, but maybe better him than whatever Kennedy-clone would probably end up with the seat? Tough call.
}:-)4
6 posted on
09/10/2009 11:35:48 AM PDT by
Moose4
(Ted Kennedy: "If they bring up Camelot, we get to bring up the lady in the lake.")
To: Clintonfatigued
He’ll never get elected, way too close to Pres. Bush.
10 posted on
09/10/2009 11:42:32 AM PDT by
alice_in_bubbaland
(Markets and Marxists Don't Mix! Audit the FED NOW!)
To: Clintonfatigued; GOPsterinMA; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; Impy
Not just that, he’s waaayyyy to closely ties to the Bushes. Of course, if this were any of another 30 or so states, that just might help him. But not in MA.
I still say Curt or bust. And it looks like bust.
Tim Cahiil for Governor and Scott Brown for Treasurer? I’d vote for them.
20 posted on
09/10/2009 12:43:44 PM PDT by
GOPsterinMA
(Who paid for Mary Jo Kopechne's funeral?)
To: Clintonfatigued
Card isn’t my choice. He’s way too much the
Washington BUSH insider.
This is Massachusetts, right? I mean we are talking about the man whose responsibility it was to make sure George W. Bush's policies were implemented by the Executive Branch. Hullo!
In fact, the only way he could possibly be elected to this seat is if he were running against George W. Bush himself.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson