Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kellynla

So the hearing to decide on the dismissal is to be held at a later date, so the motion to dismiss brought by Obama’s attorneys has not yet been ruled upon, correct?


5 posted on 09/09/2009 9:01:59 PM PDT by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: LachlanMinnesota

Judge Carter stated it would darn near take an act of GOD to dismiss this case.
That ain’t exactly what he said, but that’s exactly what he meant. The Motion to Dismiss will be heard on October 5.


15 posted on 09/09/2009 9:10:42 PM PDT by MestaMachine (One if by land, 2 if by sea, 3 if by Air Force 1.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: LachlanMinnesota

Here is a transcript of the court order.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/19547072/03118728478


27 posted on 09/09/2009 9:23:40 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: LachlanMinnesota

It is my understanding the judge denied the motion to dismiss


38 posted on 09/09/2009 9:40:44 PM PDT by humble and shy (Taking our country back, one politician at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: LachlanMinnesota
" Carter requested all counsel familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of the Central District of California in order “to secure the just, speedy and inexpensive determination of every action.”

The stated according to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that this case is very rarely dismissed.
Obama's lawyers had a weak case and the judge wants to proceed in a timely manner.
48 posted on 09/09/2009 9:50:36 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson