Posted on 09/09/2009 8:57:44 PM PDT by kellynla
SANTA ANA, Calif. – On Sept. 8, U.S. District Court Judge David O. Carter ordered a scheduling conference for Oct. 5, 2009, allowing the Obama eligibility case filed by Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. on behalf Captain Pamela Barnett, Alan Keyes and others to proceed.
Carter wrote, “The responsibility for the progress of litigation in the federal courts falls not only upon attorneys in the action, but upon the court as well. Accordingly, the court issues this order.”
Taitz filed a declaration of Lucas Daniel Smith with an exhibit on Friday.
Smith, a 29-year-old American citizen from Iowa, signed an affidavit, under penalty of perjury, stating he “traveled to Kenya and Mombasa, in particular, with the intent to obtain the original birth certificate of Barack Hussein Obama,” as he was told previously it was on file in the hospital and under seal, due to the fact the Kenyan Prime Minister is Obama’s cousin.
Smith states he visited Coast General Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya on Feb. 19, 2009, accompanied by a citizen of the Democratic Republic of Congo, and said he had to pay a cash “consideration” to a Kenyan military officer on duty to look the other way while he obtained the copy of the birth certificate.
According to Smith, the copy was signed by the hospital administrator and contains the embossed seal. As an exhibit, Smith provided the “true and correct photocopy of the birth certificate obtained.”
Meanwhile, defendants filed a motion to dismiss stating, “Plaintiffs ask this Court to entertain a challenge to the 2008 election of President Barack Obama by requiring the President to disprove, in this Court, their innuendo alleging that he is not a ‘natural born citizen’ within the meaning of the United States Constitution. Plaintiffs cannot use this Court to investigate and decide the President’s fitness for office or their related claims …
“Plaintiffs also seek to litigate in this court a variety of vaguely-defined claims purportedly related to a hodgepodge of constitutional provisions, civil and criminal statutes, and the Freedom of Information Act. These claims are equally flawed ...”
Jeff Schwilk, founder, San Diego Minutemen, attended the Sept. 8 hearing and reported back, “Judge David Carter refused to hear Obama's request for dismissal today, instead setting a hearing date for Oct. 5. He indicated there was almost no chance that this case would be dismissed. Assuming Judge Carter denies Obama's motion for dismissal, he will likely then order expedited discovery which will force Obama to release his birth certificate in a timely manner.
According to Schwilk, Carter, a former U.S. Marine, repeated several times that this case is very serious and must be resolved quickly so that the troops know their Commander in Chief is eligible to hold that position and issue lawful orders to our military in this time of war.
“Plaintiffs’ Attorney Dr. Orly Taitz did a great job, winning some huge victories today,” said Schwilk, adding, “She was fearless!”
Carter requested all counsel familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of the Central District of California in order “to secure the just, speedy and inexpensive determination of every action.”
Carter admonished counsel that a continuance of a scheduling conference is rarely granted and a continuance will only be granted only for good cause.
The most important thing that happens is that everything Obama did is reversed, except the money already spent. Appointments, laws signed, ammendments, everything. Healthcare debate would stop immediately, and I agree it needs to be changed, but not this way. It needs to be slow and deliberate, with everyone involved. Right now, Obama wants to ramrod it down our throats.
The rules for succession are in the books and have been discussed on FR already, but I can’t find them right now. Perhaps you will have better luck than I???
I am still furious with her. Have read a thing she's written since her insult.
Well you can tell her yourself! BIG SMILE
“The other baffling concept: that the courts will find the authority to remove Obambi from office.”
I say leave that to the military - or We The People.
Talk about baby footprints and the FBI verifying documents!
Please see my post at #65.
As well as every Federal contract award, which could put millions of people on the street indefinitely. As I stated earlier the Law of Unintended Consequences can be a bitch.
Thanks. I think I will sleep better tonight.
I think the chickens are coming home to roost.
This subject about baby footprints was brought up on another post here just the other day when this Kenyan BC was found to have one.
Baby footprints have been used to identify individuals who died in airplane accidents as adults. So you’re right, that they don’t really change all that much.
See 90.
Well, they are trying to prove he is not a citizen to prove he’s not legit, but w/o any documents, he’s still not legit. Why does he being born in Kenya carry more weight than not even being ‘natural born’ to begin with. I know zero could give a flip about Our Constitution but I think the Judge does. We already have ‘discovery’, IMO. Throw him out of Our House and check their baggage when they leave. Case closed.
How do you impeach someone who isn’t president?
What about it AC?
Wanna get on my “Steak Dinner Winner” list?
Sounds like a job for Sandy "Wide Cuffs" Berger. He is on a first name basis at the Archives.
Obama will declare that his Certificate of Live Birth is sufficient evidence, Game, Set, Match Obama.
“How do you impeach someone who isn’t president?”
(Sinister laugh) Send in the Marines.
Thanks. But I’ve already done so.
Don’t you forget to stock up on razor blades, toilet paper, soap, and water proof matches. Hey! Even if you don’t shave, bathe, or need a light, you can always use them for barter, right?
I think everyone knows where I stand on this issue.
BOOooYAH! RIGHT ON! It’s about DAMN time this case gets heard in court! Hope... yes hope... its a beautiful thing hope....
AND I GOTS IT NOW!
No doubt all contracts and laws would be declared invalid.
But I doubt time would immediately reverse itself to Jan.20
More likely, time would stand still until a resulting revised executive and congressional branch could discuss in light of the original’s deceptions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.