Posted on 09/09/2009 10:45:44 AM PDT by GoldStandard
If Republicans thought their headaches in the Kentucky Senate race were over when Sen. Jim Bunning (R-Ky.) announced his retirement, they were wrong.
Rand Paul, the son of former presidential candidate and Texas GOP Rep. Ron Paul, has crashed the party for Kentucky Secretary of State Trey Grayson, who is widely regarded as the establishment pick to succeed the 77-year-old Bunning.
While Paul, an ophthalmologist, is a long shot, his presence in the contest all but guarantees that Grayson will be embroiled in an expensive and potentially damaging primary contest.
It’s not the scenario the GOP was hoping for. Party officials had been maneuvering behind the scenes for months to ease out Bunning, the irascible former Major League Baseball pitcher who was widely viewed as unlikely to hold his seat against a credible Democrat. The idea was to clear a path for Grayson, who has twice been elected statewide.
“From a larger tactical perspective, I think the fact that both Grayson and Paul will raise and spend a lot of money is something the party wanted to avoid,” said Scott Jennings, a Louisville-based GOP strategist who served as deputy political director in the George W. Bush White House.
“I think it is frustrating. There certainly is a dynamic where you’d rather [Paul] not be there,” said Ted Jackson, a top Republican strategist in the state who is supporting Grayson. “If you could wish it away, you would wish it away. [Grayson is] going to have to spend money in a primary campaign.”
The heart of the GOP establishment’s problem is Paul’s ability to generate campaign cash through the same channels as his father. A widely publicized Aug. 20 “money bomb” Internet outreach to his father’s grass-roots donor list raised about $800,000. Just as troubling for GOP officials, an August SurveyUSA automated poll showed Grayson leading Paul just 37 percent to 26 percent — putting the insurgent Paul within striking distance.
All the while, Paul has sought to rally the support of his father’s backers — libertarian-minded voters who are politically active, not firmly tethered to the GOP and willing to donate.
“The risk is underestimating [Paul] — not because he is such a great candidate but because he inherits a grass-roots organization from his father,” said one Washington-based strategist who is watching the race closely.
But even as Grayson gears up for a primary, there is considerable doubt among state Republicans about how much traction Paul can actually gain, regardless of how much he spends.
While Kentucky’s Republican primary electorate is conservative, party insiders say, it is traditionally conservative — not necessarily anti-government conservative.
Either way, an expensive primary risks depleting Grayson’s coffers for what is all but certain to be a hard-fought general election campaign. And Kentucky, which includes the Cincinnati and Louisville media markets, is not an inexpensive state in which to run a campaign: Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and his Democratic challenger, Bruce Lunsford, spent more than $32 million combined in their slugfest last year.
There is also concern among GOP strategists that Paul, who is attacking Grayson on his conservative credentials on a near-daily basis, may dampen enthusiasm on the right for the secretary of state.
In an interview with POLITICO, Paul painted Grayson as a soft conservative, slamming him for once voting for President Bill Clinton and questioning why he accepted donations from senators who had voted in support of the Troubled Asset Relief Program bailout.
“I just don’t think he has a lot of hard or strong beliefs,” said Paul.
Republicans now say that ignoring Paul is no longer an option, leading them to circle the wagons around Grayson.
McConnell — the state’s most powerful Republican — isn’t endorsing Grayson outright, but he isn’t leaving any doubt that Grayson has his backing. McConnell is hosting a September fundraiser for Grayson with more than half of the Senate GOP conference scheduled to be in attendance. And two key McConnell political hands, Nate Hodson and Justin Brasell, have signed on to head up Grayson’s campaign.
Kentucky Republicans say Grayson will run a no-holds-barred primary campaign that targets the same grass-roots conservative activists on whom Paul is focusing.
“Anytime you’re dealing with an opponent who has raised the kind of money Paul has, you have to take it seriously, and you have to go out and win — and win convincingly,” said Jennings.
Some in the party see a silver lining in Paul’s candidacy. At 37, Grayson remains largely untested politically and, as a nominee, would face a general election dogfight against one of two seasoned Democratic pols: Lt. Gov. Daniel Mongiardo or Attorney General Jack Conway.
“I frankly think that Grayson needs an opponent,” said Al Cross, a longtime Kentucky political watcher who is director of the University of Kentucky’s Institute for Rural Journalism and Community Issues. “He needs a worthy opponent to sharpen his skills.”
can we ban primaries and let the RINO’s choose our candidates for us so we can over this media fixation of pretending to be worried for us?
They know what is best. We are free, to do what they tell us.
Is Grayson a RINO? I don’t know anything about him.
Voted for Clinton in 1992. Hanging out with pro-bailout senators in D.C.
Probably more; but it is hard to really go after someone who held a non-partisan position (secretary of state) and has no issues page on his campaign website.
Grayson is the KY Sec. of State. He was elected in 2003 and reelected in 2007.
I have read that Jim Bunning encouraged Grayson to run.
I attended one of his campaign announcement rallies.
He seemed to hit all the right conservative themes...less government, no to cap and trade, no to the Dem. health care bill.
His website is http://www.treygrayson.com/
There is another Republican candidate running besides Paul
His name is Bill Johnson. http://www.kentuckybill.com/
Except Paul is polling 26% (to Grayson's 37%), while Johnson is polling 2%. Also, Rand Paul has raised over $820,000 from individuals, whereas Johnson has raised only $2,210 from donors.
Paul is the only viable alternative to RINO Grayson.
I’d vote for Paul anyway but seeing how Grayson voted for Clinton I wouldn’t even have to think twice about it.
You are right Johnson has no chance...I was just putting the info. out there for those who might not know.
Let me ask you...Has Grayson done something in office or said something since announcing his candidacy for you to think that he is a RINO?
I am sincerely asking that question.
If you believe some reports, Bunning encouraged him to run.
I haven’t looked up the numbers, but didn’t Bunning have one of the most conservative voting records of any senator?
If Bunning asked Grayson to run, that is a reason for me to look at voting for him.
I have checked out Paul’s website...the only thing that I saw that I disagreed with is that he says he would have “demanded and voted against a declaration of war with Iraq.”
I am going to support the Republican nominee...whoever it is.
We can’t afford to lose this seat to a Dem.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.