Use of the term “a” gay man seems as though it’s referring to a specific individual.
It has us scratching our heads while leafing through the book of Acts.
Perhaps, once again, they are stretching what is written about in the Bible.
I’m thinking about Acts 8:26-40, the story of Philip and the Ethiopian eunuch. Perhaps they equate eunuch with homosexual.
The homo-revisionists can “gayify” any historic character by repeating a lie long enough. Look at what they did with Abe Lincoln.