Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RummyChick

http://c2.api.ning.com/files/bUWvV3M4GoI6VNzFgVb1GoaWei0uXsN9XrrF-pmT7L2*BObmQBy8pU-3iWW0I*tgTyidrJq5LQlEIbOzaRfT4I*nYes0bBpJ/COURTORDER2BARNETTCASE1954707203118728478.pdf

OK, any lawyers that can explain this?


859 posted on 09/11/2009 9:38:35 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts ma'am, just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 857 | View Replies ]


To: faucetman
OK, any lawyers that can explain this?

It's Judge Carter's order setting October 5th for the hearing on the defense's motion to dismiss. Taitz and Kreep have until September 21 to reply to the motion in writing giving their reasons why the judge should not grant it. Then the defense has until September 28th to reply in writing to the plaintiff's reply. Then the judge will hold the hearing on October 5th and will issue his ruling then or shortly thereafter. This is what they are discussing:

Motion to Dismiss

866 posted on 09/13/2009 10:29:54 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 859 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson