Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
You: The U.S. Attorneys submitted a motion for dismissal just prior to the hearing. About the only people clueless enough to expect that to have been granted or denied right off the bat are you and pissant. Taitz has the right to respond to the defense's motion, which is why there will be another hearing on October 5th.

I'm hardly clueless. Yeah, on Friday as I recall they submitted their motion to dismiss.

The judge could have granted it on Tuesday but he didn't, in fact, he hasn't even read it as of yesterday.

The judge obviously wasn't going to dismiss this case. What he wants from Obama is to respond to the charges that he's not a natural born citizen. The judge is giving Obama time to respond, the sooner the better, and that he is serious about this case so he better be.

You: The fact is that other than the motion to dismiss, the defense had not filed any motions, only an order noting that the plaintiff had failed to effect service of process but saying that they would accept service on September 8th. I assume somewhere in that circus yesterday that was done.

The silly dilly-dallying by Obama lawyers have now admitted to Judge Carter that they have accepted the service. The "circus" was mostly about the cheap delaying tactics by Obama's silly lawyers which didn't work.

Since you soooooooo ignored what Judge Carter's profound words here they are again:

Carter, “If President Obama fits the qualifications under the rules of the court, the longer the delay the more credibility it lends to the complaint,” he said. “If President Obama does not meet the court’s requirements, the delay also causes a problem.”

And

During this morning’s proceedings, Carter said he had not yet read the motion to dismiss the case. But he said such motions, when based on Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12 (b), rarely succeed. That is the rule cited by West in his motion.

The obvious conclusion from Judge Carter's statements are the onus or burden of proof, is on Obama to convince the judge why he should dismiss this case and not grant discovery to the plaintiff. Spin your spin 180 degrees.

You: No, I read transcripts. And we'll see sometime on or shortly after October 5th whether there will be a trial or not.

Apparently, you missed Judge Carter's statements posted in bold above. Your turn to obfuscate and ignore the obvious.

719 posted on 09/09/2009 5:26:02 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 597 | View Replies ]


To: Red Steel
The judge could have granted it on Tuesday but he didn't, in fact, he hasn't even read it as of yesterday.

Why would he grant it without giving the other side a chance to respond? Are you sure you aren't clueless?

The judge obviously wasn't going to dismiss this case.

Not on Tuesday, no.

What he wants from Obama is to respond to the charges that he's not a natural born citizen. The judge is giving Obama time to respond, the sooner the better, and that he is serious about this case so he better be.

Respond to what? His own motion to dismiss?

The silly dilly-dallying by Obama lawyers have now admitted to Judge Carter that they have accepted the service. The "circus" was mostly about the cheap delaying tactics by Obama's silly lawyers which didn't work.

Because Taitz has been too inept to do it properly in the past 8 months.

During this morning’s proceedings, Carter said he had not yet read the motion to dismiss the case. But he said such motions, when based on Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12 (b), rarely succeed. That is the rule cited by West in his motion.

I'm betting that you haven't read the motion, either. Well, keep telling yourself that stuff and we'll see what happens in October.

720 posted on 09/09/2009 5:37:14 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 719 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson