[BP2]

And the great thing is even if Orly can't move forward with this judge, the primer has been cracked as to how to move beyond any “lack of standing” issues that have plagued prior eligibility cases.

How so?

My intellectually-dishonest FRiend — I shall not be divulging that to an obvious obfuscator as yourself.

But as I've said elsewhere, the answer lies within “KEITH LANCE ET AL. v. MIKE COFFMAN”, “FRED HOLLANDER v. JOHN MCCAIN” and others.

Kudos to Orly, who seems to be listening. Kreep and others will keep things on track.

[Non-Sequitur]

My intellectually-dishonest FRiend — I shall not be divulging that to an obvious obfuscator as yourself.

You don't know either, huh?

But as I've said elsewhere, the answer lies within “KEITH LANCE ET AL. v. MIKE COFFMAN”, “FRED HOLLANDER v. JOHN MCCAIN” and others.

And what makes you think that the judge won't find that Orly's plaintiffs lack standing as well?