Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mkjessup

Yes, I saw the proof of liar posts and do agree that eligibility has not been proven. Hasn’t the “argument” been going on for a year? Regardless, I just wanted to speak out against the fight. On a positive note, you guys gave a pretty darn good recap of the issue on this thread.


618 posted on 09/09/2009 8:42:08 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8 (I am Jim Thompson............................Please pray for our troops....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 602 | View Replies ]


To: ~Kim4VRWC's~

Thanks Kim, there ought to be universal agreement among all conservatives that 0bama has NOT proven his eligibility, there should be likewise, universal agreement that such eligibility is not requested, but DEMANDED by the Constitution (Article II Section 1) and if any individual either seeking, or having attained the Office of President is unable to provide such proof of natural born citizenship, they are by default, in violation of the Constitutional requirements for the highest office in the Land. This isn’t rocket science here.

Former President George W. Bush said “you are either with us, or you are with the terrorists” and that could easily be extrapolated in this case to “you are either with the Constitution, or you are with 0bama”.

I’ve already made my choice.


623 posted on 09/09/2009 9:20:11 AM PDT by mkjessup (Jefferson was right about needing to periodically water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 618 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson