He could have done that back in July because Taitz was so inept that she never properly served the defendant. But he didn't. He didn't dismiss today because Taitz is entitled to put together a reply to the motion to dismiss. He might well do it on October 5th, and if he does you will no doubt accuse him of bullshit logic.
But I keep saying Taitz. It's now the Orly Taitz and Gary Kreep show, isn't it? What a circus that was. Two different attorneys representing two different sets of plaintiffs in one trial, and neither one is on speaking terms with the other. A dismissal might be a blessing to them both.
Nonsense. He could have pulled a fast one just like the Wash Supreme Court did to Steve Pidgeon.