Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pissant

Those cases weren’t dismissed based on a motion to dismiss. They were dismissed before the defendants even entered an appearance (or were served).

Here, defendants entered an appearance and were served, and filed motion to dismiss. Plaintiffs must have a chance to respond. And, today’s Court order gives plaintiffs until Sept. 28 to respond.


339 posted on 09/08/2009 7:29:51 PM PDT by Sibre Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies ]


To: Sibre Fan

Not necessarily true in all cases. But Carter could have used the exact same BS logic as the other judges. Just like the DOJ urged him to do. Dismiss for lack of standing and/or jurisdiction


343 posted on 09/08/2009 7:33:15 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies ]

To: Sibre Fan

Stop. Facts only confuse him.


344 posted on 09/08/2009 7:34:23 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson