Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: secretagent
Errr...isn't there a real specific and clear amendment on this in the bill of rights...
4 posted on 09/08/2009 1:11:45 PM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: 2banana
Errr...isn't there a real specific and clear amendment on this in the bill of rights...

The courts used incredibly tortured and corrupt language to support "asset forfeiture."

The police don't need to charge you, if they think that the property MIGHT have come from illegal activity. Instead, they "arrest" the property. Since the property isn't a person, it has no rights. Therefore, they can take your property for pretty much any reason, and YOU have to prove that you came by it "legitamately," and pay for the chance to do so.

It's so WRONG it is enough to make one's head spin. But it's "legal."

Mark

14 posted on 09/08/2009 1:48:42 PM PDT by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: 2banana
wrote: Errr...isn't there a real specific and clear amendment on this in the bill of rights...

The 4th:

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. ”

22 posted on 09/08/2009 4:39:35 PM PDT by secretagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson