Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paladin2

It’s not just the cutoff in frequency, it also has to do with the digital sampling rate. The higher the frequency of the waveform, the less accurate the sample will be. With the CD sample rate, you start to lose some of the quality of the reproduction of the analog signal long before 20Khz


17 posted on 09/08/2009 9:37:56 AM PDT by dfwright (The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left (Eccl. 10:2, NIV))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: dfwright

Also depends on the frequency response and phase shifting of your analog hardware along the way to your ear.


32 posted on 09/08/2009 9:44:57 AM PDT by Paladin2 (Big Ears + Big Spending --> BigEarMarx, the man behind TOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: dfwright
The higher the frequency of the waveform, the less accurate the sample will be. With the CD sample rate, you start to lose some of the quality of the reproduction of the analog signal long before 20Khz

Flat wrong. No, really, that is absolutely wrong. Go read up on the Nyquist Theorem, to wit: every frequency up to X Hz can be perfectly reproduced by sampling at 2X Hz. CDs sample at 44kHz. Human hearing maxes out around 20kHz (most adults are lower than that). Filter out everything over 20kHz, sample at 44kHz, and the data representation of that sound is complete (any subsequent limitations are due to analog microphone & speakers).

71 posted on 09/08/2009 10:32:48 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (flag@whitehouse.gov may bounce messages but copies may be kept. Informants are still solicited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson