Posted on 09/08/2009 5:46:39 AM PDT by SJackson
RAMALLAH, Sept. 8 (Xinhua) -- A senior Palestinian official unveiled Tuesday some details of a peace plan for a permanent peaceful solution to the Israeli-Arab conflict, which was recently drafted by U.S. President Barack Obama, who intends to officially declare it soon.
According to Hassan Khraisha, deputy speaker of the Palestinian parliament, the plan includes the establishment of an independent Palestinian statehood first in the West Bank, and then Gaza Strip will be included, while holy sites in East Jerusalem will be under Arab and Islamic supervision.
Khraisha, who is also an independent lawmaker in the Hamas-dominated parliament, accused some Palestinian figures in the Palestinian National Authority (PNA) of knowing about the plan before and trading it with other Palestinian, Arab and Israeli figures.
Related Israel approves more Jewish housing units in West Bank settlements
China urges Israel to act cautiously
PNA: no economic meetings with Israel unless demands met
Israeli PM says nearing deal with U.S. on settlements
Hamas movement, which opposes the plan, seized control of the Gaza Strip by force in June 2007 and routed west-backed President Mahmoud Abbas security forces.
President Obama is determined to present his peace plan which is expected to resume the stalled peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians, and help the Palestinians to establish their Palestinian state by the year 2011.
Khraisha revealed to Xinhua that he had managed to get a draft of the new U.S. plan for peace, charging that the draft was being traded among some Arab, Palestinian and Israeli figures.
Khraisha, who declined to say from where he got the draft, said that the U.S. administration had finalized the plan with the assistance of some Jewish figures specialized in the Israeli-Palestinian affairs.
"The plan is based on establishing a Palestinian statehood by the year 2011. It talks about resettling a limited number of Palestinian refugees in the Jordan valley and other areas in the West Bank," Khraisha said. The "refugees" will be resettled in an area between Nablus and Ramallah.
He also revealed that "the plan calls for establishing an international fund association to help the Palestinian refugees. The plan did not show what would be the fate of the Palestinian refugees living in Jordan, Lebanon, Syria and other Arab and foreign countries.
"The new U.S. plan calls for turning the different armed Palestinian factions into political parties which condemn the use of violence against Israel," said Khraisha.
He also said that one the most significant points in the draft of the plan is "to fully normalize the ties between the Arab states and Israel."
Khraisha warned that the question of East Jerusalem is one of the most significant questions in the new U.S. plan.
"The plan puts parts of East Jerusalem under the full Israeli sovereignty without any actual Palestinian control on it. But the holy sites will be under Arab and Islamic administration," said Khraisha.
He also revealed that according to the plan, the Palestinian state starts first in the West Bank, and then it will be followed by the Gaza Strip, which is controlled by Hamas movement.
About the Israeli settlements, the plan talks about keeping big settlements in the West Bank, and to start negotiations on smaller settlements within three months, while keeping the rest of the territory of the West Bank demilitarized with Israeli control of the air.
The plan, according to Khraisha also calls for intensifying the Israeli-Palestinian security coordination in the West Bank, adding that it prevents the (PNA) from making any foreign military alliances in the region.
On the issue of Palestinian prisoners, the plan includes an Israeli release of a number of prisoners from its jails as soon as a permanent peace agreement is signed between Israel and the PNA. The prisoners' release would take three years, according to the plan.
Khraisha slammed the U.S. plan, saying "it means to dwarf the Palestinian political project and smashes the legitimate rights of the Palestinians in two basic issues, Jerusalem and the refugees return."
"The plans and declarations of Prime Minister Salam Fayyad to start building up the establishments and the institutions of the future Palestinian statehood might be made in accordance with the U.S. peace plan," said Khraisha.
He said that the PNA "might deal with the plan, which is very dangerous and it comes in a status of Palestinian weakness due to the current political rift between Hamas and Fatah."
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Did Israel’s Jews ever imagine their US co-religionists would put Arafat’s heir in the White House?
Yes, Matilda, they really are that stupid.
And, most probably believe that capitalism is bad also.
Right along with Michael Moore.
I actually like the Palestinian “Right of Return” idea, and think we should make it universal.
After all, we're all refugees. Indians crossed the Bering Sea fleeing cold and hunger, the Irish came here fleeing poverty, and Poles were fleeing a lack of opportunity. So if you your Scotch-Irish-German-Indian, you should have a right of return to the UK, Ireland, Germany and Asia at large. The current governments in those areas will be allowed no input on the matter whatsoever on who moves back to their countries. So a convicted murderer could move back to any country from which he claimed an ancestral link (my own ancestors came from Monacco or Bermuda, I'm quite sure of it,) and that country could do nothing to block it. Sounds like a winning formula to me. What's good enough for Israel should be good enough for everyone else.
“On the issue of Palestinian prisoners, the plan includes an Israeli release of a number of prisoners from its jails as soon as a permanent peace agreement is signed between Israel and the PNA. The prisoners’ release would take three years, according to the plan.”
Was there any issue of Israeli prisoners, like...oh...Gilat Shalit?
There is, of course, one major exception. Jews can’t ever return to Israel. If they’re here, they must leave or die. If they built a perfectly good, civil society and survived despite overwhelming odds, they must leave or die. If they spent two thousand years pining to return and then finally did, they must leave or die. But everyone else everywhere has a right of return to anywhere.
The Palestinian proposal calls for Israel to willing allow itself to be invaded by a hostile population which does not recognize Israel's right to exist. If my reading of the Koran is correct, many people in this population are comfortable with the idea of an eventual genocide, on religious grounds.
The Palestinians can put demands on Israel that might seem neutral to an outside observer. The right of return sounds harmless, but there can be absolutely no reciprocity. The Palestinian controlled areas are, it's my impression, Judenrein for all practical purposes. Observers living in peaceful societies can easily misread the Palestinian proposals by falsely assuming that the Palestinians want a peaceful coexistence with Jewish Israelis.
Bibi did them one better when he said he could recognize a Palestinian state with no air force or army. For the outside observer who thinks the Palestinians are peaceful, Bibi's proposal seems absolutely reasonable. What do the peaceful Palestinians need with a military? Since leftists dream of a world with no military, it sounds like Bibi was proposing utopia. Basically, he recognized the negations with the Palestinians as the hollow charade that they are.
Humanly, I don't see any peace without Israeli hegemony and the Palestinian controlled territories being absorbed into Jordan and Egypt. Iraq and Iran fought for eight years and lost hundreds of thousands of lives over a sliver of land. Egypt and Jordan won't expand their territories for love or money be absorbing Gaza and the West Bank. Any concern they have for the people living in Palestine is a farce.
One positive side to Americans having to live through an Obama administration is that it will show unequivocally what attempts to negotiate with Hamas and other Palestinian organizations will accomplish. Less than nothing.
Actually, the “Palestinian controlled areas” are anything but Judenrein. There are tiny wild-cat settlements popping up all the time, sometimes just a few families, sometimes only one single mother, her kids and an M16, and there’s no way of measuring or tracking it. But the wild-catters are tough as nails. They’ll stand there on their hilltops and take on all comers, and beat everyone including the IDF bulldozers. They just wait a while and come right back, start over again. Diplomats can draw borders and governments can give orders, but the Jewish “right of return” has been coming for two thousand years, and nothing can hold it back. Myself, I’m too much of a wuss to wild-cat it. But the people who do that have my unreserved admiration and respect.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.