Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ObamaCare's brave new world: Disabled just won't make it to birth
NY Post ^ | September 7, 2009 | MEGHAN CLYNE

Posted on 09/07/2009 6:53:58 PM PDT by Scanian

Sarah Palin ignited a political firestorm when she worried that "death panels" would deny end-of-life treatment to her son with Down syndrome. In fact, ObamaCare would more likely see to it that people like Trig never even make it out of the womb.

The outlook for children found to have disabilities in utero is bleak now -- because the medical-ethics establishment has spent decades pushing for their abortion.

Thanks to advances in prenatal testing, it's now far easier to detect conditions like cystic fibrosis and spina bifida -- and our "best and brightest" overwhelmingly counsel parents to destroy the unborn child. It's estimated that about 90 percent of American babies with Down Syndrome are now aborted.

We're clearly on our way to the systematic elimination of "imperfect" people. And President Obama's "health-care reform" would get us there faster, by vastly expanding the government's influence over private health-care decisions.

Even without accounting for "the public option," the Congressional Budget Office estimates that the Dems' health-care scheme would cause the number of non-elderly Americans relying on government for health care to spike from 40 million to 73 million. To offset this massive growth in government outlays, President Obama has pledged that bureaucrats will "bend the cost curve" by setting coverage rules and determining physician fees -- for everyone, even those not getting treated on the government's dime.

With finite resources, government has every incentive to keep heavy consumers of health care off the public insurance rolls. And it isn't hard to see where an unborn baby with a disability will land on the government's priority list.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; bhoabortion; bhohealthcare; deathpanels; eugenics; inuterodefects; newborn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: Scanian
'Best and brightest?' Please, these are dead-soul leftist eugenicists, the worst of the ghouls left from the twentieth century. Holdren doesn't even believe a newborn fully a human being until 'socialization' is testable occurring! Cass Sunstein believes animals and trees deserve legal court representation but alive unborn humans do not.
21 posted on 09/07/2009 7:51:07 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Dems, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

It’s a shame that something so fundamental to a system’s success as the costs associated with individual life has become so embarrassingly personal.


22 posted on 09/07/2009 7:51:46 PM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bog trotter

Might want to check if that ‘physician’ had an arrangement with fetal tissue harvesters.


23 posted on 09/07/2009 7:52:17 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Dems, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Steven Tyler

I understand the last year of a person’s life is where 90% OF HIS/HER HEALTHCARE DOLLARS ARE SPENT! If that is true, and I
am not sure it is, then we could reduce our health care cost
by 90% by introduction of the “death panel”!

Sounds inhuman and cruel but thought provoking.


24 posted on 09/07/2009 8:08:29 PM PDT by ajay_kumar (There are realists and there are one issue voters (aka losers))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: bog trotter
What is new? My brother-in-law was in the army and when sis was pregnant, the doctor told her that the test showed some abnormality and when did she want to schedule the abortion? All in one breath.

A McClellan AFB doctor told me 21 years ago that I was miscarrying and tried to force a D & C. I refused. The pregnancy continued. When I was in my ninth month, he asked my husband how I was. Husband said, "she's due to deliver any day now." You know what he said in response? "That wasn't supposed to happen."

25 posted on 09/07/2009 8:17:46 PM PDT by pray4liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt; Scanian

Rembrandt, thank you for telling us about your son. I’m glad he and his bride survived Roe v. Wade, which has claimed so many Down Syndrome babies. Now if they can just survive the Brave New World 0bama has in store for us (if he’s not defeated).

Our grandson, 15 mo. old, was born with spina bifida. It was not detected until hours before his birth. The nurses were beside themselves that the disorder wasn’t found in time for an abortion.

Fortunately, he was immediately transported to a Neonatal Intensive Care unit in a big city hospital hours away. He received the best of care there, with off-duty nurses coming in, begging to hold him.

His nerves are damaged below the waist, which will impair his ability to walk, among other challenges.

For everything he physically lacks, he makes up for it in personality and joy of life. I’ve never seen a child so full of joy, every moment of the day. He’s the love of our lives, and we view him as Sarah views Trig: “Perfect”


26 posted on 09/07/2009 9:34:00 PM PDT by ntnychik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ntnychik

“Rembrandt, thank you for telling us about your son.”

I’ve known a lot of handicapped kids over the years. Most are great kids and many have surprisingly great talents. I remember one who used to call in to a radio sports program and the people there knew him because of his frequent calls. Matt was a great kid who had CP; he died of a seizure.


27 posted on 09/07/2009 9:56:41 PM PDT by Rembrandt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
Real quick: my wife was 42 when we conceived and we were pretty much required to speak to a Dr. who specialized in prenatal diagnostics. We told him that we had been trying for several years to have a child. But, given our age, he rattled off all the things that could go wrong. The list was immense and intended to frighten us. He wanted to stab my wife's womb with a large syringe to extract genetic info - with the risk being aborting our long awaited baby.

Long story short - we told him that whatever God blessed us with - that we'd love him without question. We would not increase our risks by testing for "abnormalities".

Our little boy was born perfect - well better then perfect. It's hard to imagine a more suitable gift of life that we could have been given!

28 posted on 09/07/2009 10:27:23 PM PDT by uncommonsense (Liberals see what they believe; conservatives believe what they see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ajay_kumar

I guess you missed my nuance.
The over arching debate concerns freedom-freedom to earn money, pursue happiness, and make your own decisions on how to spend your money.
I do not need a Government bureaucrat mico-managing my life


29 posted on 09/08/2009 8:47:05 PM PDT by Steven Tyler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: narses; Scanian

bump


30 posted on 09/09/2009 8:02:05 PM PDT by Dajjal (Obama is an Ericksonian NLP hypnotist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson