“It’s a document he got by bribing someone. I’m not sure a judge will consider that as a piece of ‘evidence.’”
Why not? Judges issue search warrants based upon information from paid informants all the time. I can’t see that a bribed foreign official is any less credible than a local paid informant that is most likely a convicted felon.
Folks, I rest my case. Would you want your case judged by a fool who thinks convicted and paid felons are credible? I've enjoyed Free Republic because we, for the most part, tend not to make sh*t up. For years this has been known as the smart conservative site. Let's keep it that way!
Of course, there would have to be an evidentiary hearing first to determine the document’s authenticity. I’m afraid the Court is going to want more than just a purloined, stamped birth certificate to form the necessary predicate to force Obama into responding to this “evidence”, like the Kenyan notary who placed the notary seal on the document, Kenyan hospital officials, et cetera. There is also a chain of custody issue that will probably take years to sort out.
I am sure the conscience of the Court will be shocked if this document was seriously offered as evidence in Tuesday’s hearing.
ex animo
davidfarrar