Posted on 09/06/2009 6:33:51 AM PDT by deport
no, i’m not familiar with the story. can you point me in the right direction.
Cheers!
Close enough. Attended a wedding in Galveston. Good thing it wasn't hurricane season :-)
Cheers!
Slept in a mule barn/cabin in Crested Butte CO. at -30 F.
Good thing I had a great sleeping bag.
Got up to a balmy -10 F. the next day.
Guessing it *feels* colder in MN. (as I sit here posting in shorts and a tanktop. 96* today)
have a nice winter!
Cheers!
Texas, of course.
Texas has many a mile of coastline but, Galveston is probably the worst example. Further south you go, the better it gets.
I’ve lived here most of my 50+ years and can’t say I’ve seen anywhere near the *whole* state. It’s just too damn big.
Happy non-Labor Day!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2331576/posts
You gotta go and read the whole story, its pretty wild.
I was never talking about past cases.
And as far as DNA, there’s lots of crime, particularly nonviolent crime where DNA plays no roll.
Bank scams, confidence scams, robbery, you name it.
There are people who will kill for $80,000. Just because you won’t doesn’t mean others won’t.
It is you who watch too much CSI. People get convicted all the time with just circumstantial evidence. No science magic involved at all. Setting up a crime event so it points to you isn’t difficult with a little planning.
Yeah, there are a lot of people who will kill for $80,000, but I don't think they can pull off a masterful plot to get themselves wrongfully convicted and then have the DNA to clear their case.
Evidence is hard to get rid of, such as footprints, finger prints, saliva, hair etc. Even a thief in the type of crimes you mentioned would leave some type of evidence that would be discovered and examined.
But hey what do I know? I watch too much CSI, though so far I haven't seen any with Larry Fishburne.
And you mentioned people from 3M, and I didn't know they had facilities in Texas...so I got confused.
My apologies.
Everything you assume is violent crime.
There’s lots of other crime where DNA plays no role. Foot prints play no roll. Saliva plays no roll. Hair plays no roll.
Any number of white collar crimes use non of the above.
Most crimes get little police attention when it comes to detailed scientific evidence. That takes time and money of which they are unwilling to spend much of on your loss. See how much evidence the police take if your house gets robbed. It isn’t a CSI world.
The idea that a carreer criminal would be able to create a fake crime scene and set himself up then arrange for exculpatory evidence to be discovered all without being discovered tells me you have never had to deal with the vast majority of criminals.
Criminals is criminals cause criminals is dumb.
The mob will make a business out of it.
From "THE LAST SAMURAI"
"You want me to kill Japos, I'll kill Japos. You want me to kill the enemies of Japos, I'll kill the enemies of Japos. You pay me and I'll kill anyone you want. I just want you to know, though, that I'd kill you for free."
There are always some people who will try to game the system, no matter what the system is, no matter how good it's intentions.
Look at our current President.
Now, where have I heard this before...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.