No, a letter wasn't sent directly to him about his overdue books. No, nobody ever complained about his keeping artifacts for far too long. No, nobody ever complained about his not managing inter-institutional transfers properly. No, nobody ever complained that he didn't keep artifacts in good condition. Someone might think that if he read the report or the DI press releases, but it's all right there in the emails.
Sure, the management let that slide and still considered him to be in good standing. Some persecution, huh? I think they just said that because they wanted the IDer attacks to go away. There was a lot of political pressure on them, as you have surely noticed.
The letter was from Senator Santorum and Representative Souder.
Two ultra-religious DI proponents who have an interest in promoting the lie of a persecution.
And I'm still trying to find evidence of any misinformation about him. Haven't found any yet, except from the IDers, of course.
Again, your opinion and 5 dollars. The records clearly demonstrate, by the letters from SI, from the investigation by the OSC, and the last investigation by the Congressional staff, that the allegations were unfounded. The question of overdue books is a red herring, but how does one determine from unopened mail on a desk what is contained in unopened letters on a desk, especially when the desk is not yours, in an office which is not yours.
Two ultra-religious DI proponents who have an interest in promoting the lie of a persecution.
You are the liar. Plus "NCSE HAD NO BUSINESS..."
And I'm still trying to find evidence of any misinformation about him
Learn to look beyond your nose. An email(8/26/2004) from Hans Sues, Associate Director for Research and Collections, NMNH, replying to Eugenie Scott, NCSE, stated ...
I was interested to see that you characterize von Sternberg as a young-earth creationist.
That was just one.