Now you're nit-picking to get away from the fact that the DI was in on this early to try to promote ID and to provide legal help.
Well I showed you the document which doesn't have the markings which are claimed.
Read the article. The DI did not want this out. They had to go into spin mode once it was leaked.
No. You claim that. I am demonstrating that a DVD is not a conspiracy. Testimony shows that it was not Buckingham who presented the DVD to the board.(unless like you do one conflates Buckingham with the board.)
Read the article. The DI did not want this out. They had to go into spin mode once it was leaked.
Where is the leaked copy? It will have the alleged markings. OH! It doesn't exist?