[[I’m pretty sure the post was referring to Guillermo Gonzalez, not Sternberg]]
The original comment was about sternberg, and it was insinuated that he couldn’t possibly be trusted to state anythign scientific becuase he was denied tenure, and he was accused of lying (qwithout any proof that he actually did lie- it was nothign but a baseless accusation- per usual)
“The original comment was about sternberg, and it was insinuated that he couldn’t possibly be trusted to state anythign scientific becuase he was denied tenure, and he was accused of lying (qwithout any proof that he actually did lie- it was nothign but a baseless accusation- per usual)”
—I’m not sure which comment is the “original comment”, but I don’t see Sternberg being brought up until post 686. And you’re probably still confusing Gonzalez with Sternberg since Sternberg was never denied tenure (nor has he ever sought tenure). (If you’re thinking of post 668, that was definitely referring to Gonzalez).