[[embryology, information theory, the Cambrian Explosion, population genetics, etc]]
Pretty powerful evidence agaisnt Macroevolution coupled along with mathematics, biological evidences, the second law- pretty devestating if you ask me
[[So not only was the article inappropriate for ANY science journal,]]
Funny, I thought scientific journals covered embryology, information theory, the Cambrian Explosion, population genetics, etc
“Pretty powerful evidence agaisnt Macroevolution coupled along with mathematics, biological evidences, the second law- pretty devestating if you ask me”
—Not if you ask me (nor the vast majority of the world’s scientists who actually study the subjects).
“Funny, I thought scientific journals covered embryology, information theory, the Cambrian Explosion, population genetics, etc”
—They do - but journals are for articles with something new to say, which this article didn’t. (And even if it DID have something new to say and was appropriate for a science journal, this was entirely the wrong journal for the subject matter.)