I can understand the contempt for others reviewing your work when it is uniformly rejected.
move it a few hundred years in advance and you’ll burn me
Any group that gets fanatical can get to the stage where they do that. At least science isn't about fanaticism. We see what happens when science gets corrupted with politics though -- global warming. Science corrupted by religious fanaticism would be just as bad.
liberal nonsense
There you go with personal attacks again, if it doesn't agree with your religion then it must be liberal.
It isn't? Even when people lose their jobs because they don't toe the hardcore, atheistic ToE line?
There have been threads on that very topic, about men who've questioned that and allowed for the role of God in creation, or at least declined to answer where they stand on the God creating the universe and life, and there have been calls for their heads.
And you don't consider that fanaticism?
It isn't rejected, it's dismissed. I don't even think liberals read at all...they just whine about religious attacks on science whenever their cult is threatened and think that is peer review.
There you go with personal attacks again, if it doesn't agree with your religion then it must be liberal.
Ummm this is Free Republic, it's not a "personal attack" to expose liberalism. All your discomforts aside... And evolution, which views any and all dissent as a religious attack on science, is unquestionably liberalism.