Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CottShop; Radix

The test also clearly states that God created both man and animals from the dust of the ground.

How that can be interpreted as meaning He used evolution without massive twisting of Scripture, or blowing it off as allegory, is beyond me.

Scripture is the truth. Anyone who believes that isn’t going to try to manipulate it to fit any pet POV they have.


606 posted on 09/05/2009 9:40:11 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 601 | View Replies ]


To: metmom; CottShop; Radix
Sheesh, not again....

The test text also clearly states that God created both man and animals from the dust of the ground.

612 posted on 09/05/2009 9:45:19 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 606 | View Replies ]

To: metmom

How about Genesis 1:11-12 ? God commanded the earth to bring forth grass, “and the earth brought forth grass”. Isn’t this evolutionary? Or at least naturalistic? Please note that God does not DESIGN the grass. He COMMANDS the earth to bring it forth. Isn’t this fatal to “intelligent design”, from a literalistic point of view?


646 posted on 09/06/2009 12:02:13 AM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 606 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson