[Rebel_Ace]

GGG wrote:

"Mr. Socialist is trying to play the victim. Our little spat didn’t come out of nowhere. The newb began insulting me from the first time he ever replied to one of my threads. Here’s an example..."

So I chased down GGG's example from the very link he posted, and I found the post from socialismislost. I quote it here completely for all to read:

"no it can not. There is no such thing as a historical science. There is history describing science. Archeology can never be used to understand Alexandar the Great in a historical sense, and the same argument for the other sciences you have listed. Paleontology can never reconstruct the physical past as dinosaurs existed millions of years ago. You are purposefully defining history with science. If your argument was correct, paleontology would be able to reconstruct a physical dinosaur with the same conditions that it existed millions of years ago. History describes the past. Science explains it. You continue post after post to equate the two words."

Where are the INSULTS? Where are the PERSONAL ATTACKS? Where is the inappropriate language? This reads to me like a DIFFERENCE OF OPINION REGARDING NOMANCLATURE.

You'll need to grow a thicker skin, if this is the best example you can cite for insulting posts...

[GodGunsGuts]

Here is the exact quote from Mr. Socialist-Retread I was drawing attention to. And let me tell you, it’s a real compliment!:

“To be quite frank, you are giving Christians, and religion in general, a bad name here with your non-arguments. Thats why I still feel you must be joking around in a sick sort of way.”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2325829/posts?page=55#55

Do you always go out of your way to misrepresent your fellow FReepers on behalf of the Temple of Darwin?