Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Letters - Persecute Protectors: O's Misguided Values
The New York Post ^ | September 3, 2009 | Various

Posted on 09/04/2009 1:40:45 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Ralph Peters is spot-on in regards to the investigations into CIA operatives who kept our country safe during the Bush administration ("Punishing Patriots," PostOpinion, Sept. 1).

It seems that President Obama & Co. care more about the rights of terrorists, violent criminals and sex offenders than they do about the safety of American citizens.

Law-enforcement officers should use any reasonable interrogation method to ensure that sickos like Khalid Sheik Mohammed and Phillip Garrido are unable to cause any further harm to humanity.

For some delusional reason, the left is in disagreement.

M. Nugent

Staten Island

***

What will it take for people to start listening to Peters? This man is not Chicken Little, running around warning that the sky is falling. His astute analyses are always on the mark.

Peters loves America and wants to protect it -- unlike Attorney General Eric Holder, who is willing to risk our safety in the hope that he will one day be able to wag his finger at the Bush administration and say, "I told you so."

It's scary because there is no Hollywood-type exit from his folly, and Holder has the full approval of Obama.

People are going to die because Obama and Holder have decided that they want a new world order. This is not what we voted for in November.

Tom Cahill

Manhattan

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 911; agenda; bush; cheney; cia; democrats; ericholder; obama
Wow! Five-to-One in the CIA's favor at a New York newspaper (I realize the Post is more conservative than the Times, etc, but still!) Zero stepped on it, once again, it would seem!
1 posted on 09/04/2009 1:40:45 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This is for Tom Cahill: If you voted for this turd, unvetted not scrutinized ; this is what you voted for blindly. This , my friend, is your hopey changey and all the “yes we can”. You forgot to demand what all that bs meant.


2 posted on 09/04/2009 3:02:32 AM PDT by DooDahhhh (AMEN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson