Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Canadian Outrage
Speaking of the SCOTUS, I am still amazed at the fact that the entire Court (with the sole exception of Justice Alito) actually met in chambers WITH 0bama prior to the Inauguration in a highly questionable ex parte proceeding (questionable and unethical due to the fact that there were still cases on the docket pending before the SCOTUS with 0bama named as one of the parties, without permitting the opposing parties to attend and to observe. No transcript was kept of that meeting (to my knowledge), what was discussed has never been revealed.

In other words, the SCOTUS was either bought off, or intimidated by forces far more sinister than we can imagine.
62 posted on 09/03/2009 4:23:09 PM PDT by mkjessup ("Just Say No" to the illegal 0bamunist Regime of Occupation. The 'Dear Comrade' can Kiss My Ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: mkjessup

My God, thanks for that information. I did not know that. I guess that explains some things huh? WHO would have ever believed we would see this day? Not me. Nothing but nothing is surprising anymore. CO


92 posted on 09/03/2009 5:12:59 PM PDT by Canadian Outrage (Conservatism is to a country what an antibiotic is to an infection - Healing!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: mkjessup
In other words, the SCOTUS was either bought off, or intimidated by forces far more sinister than we can imagine.

...or just thought the Birther cases were nonsense.

Incidentally, there is nothing unethical about the Supreme Court justices meeting with Obama when there were cases pending before it against him. It would only be unethical if they discussed the cases. Remember when Justice Scalia went hunting with Vice President Cheney while a case against Cheney was pending before the Court? And that was a real case, one the Court had agreed to hear. The cases against Obama were "pending" only in the sense that petitions asking the Court to hear those cases had been filed; none of those petitions were granted (or even got one vote).

94 posted on 09/03/2009 5:22:36 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson