What is most bewildering about you is that you know all of this. You just refuse to give it any weight. Instead of wanting the truth you attempt to put up a road block to those who seek it, thus protecting the accused who is clearly demonstrating guilty behavior.
I have pointed all of this out to you before. I just come along now and then so that new readers will understand what you are doing.
Most of them, yeah.
They are mumerous and most undermine his status as natural born including his parentage.
But none of them seem to have anything other than opinion and conjecture to back them up. And so many of them are easily shown to be false. That's the problem I've had with them all along. Making claims is one thing, backing them up is another. And that's where your allegations fall apart.
If you don't think the conflicting information, unanswered questions, and contradictions constitute probable cause for him to release the info, perhaps the fact that he's a publically elected official and has a respopnsibility to the electorate msy appeal to you as an American.
I don't see unsupported claims as probable cause. If you had any evidence at all to offer then I'd agree with you that he needs to show the evidence to be false...if he can. But until you have something indicating he's been lying all along then he's under no obligation to humor you.
What is most bewildering about you is that you know all of this. You just refuse to give it any weight. Instead of wanting the truth you attempt to put up a road block to those who seek it, thus protecting the accused who is clearly demonstrating guilty behavior.
And his guilty behavior is what? Not doing what you want him to do?