Unfortunately, due to the poor education and poor writing skills of most journalists these days, that may not be the case. There have clearly been different ways of phrasing what happened, with one story implying the pro-reform person was the biter and another story implying it was the anti-reform person who was the biter.
Why can't they just spell it out??
And, I guess the new MSM template is “Pro-Reform” and “Anti-Reform.”
Not too much bias there, huh?
What is an anti-reform person? There is no reform, there is pro-nationalized healthcare and pro-single payer system(current system).
AntiCommunist maybe.