Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PapaBear3625
I agree with this. Let the father opt out of support. But I could not agree with essentially giving the father ultimate say over the woman's body.

The father can keep his swimmers to himself if he's really that worried.

33 posted on 09/02/2009 8:38:17 PM PDT by TNdandelion (I'd rather have FedEx run my healthcare than USPS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: TNdandelion

Fathers have a natural right to protect the lives of their own children, whether you endorse that right or not.


41 posted on 09/02/2009 9:25:56 PM PDT by TheFourthMagi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: TNdandelion
I agree with this. Let the father opt out of support. But I could not agree with essentially giving the father ultimate say over the woman's body. The father can keep his swimmers to himself if he's really that worried.

What I'm proposing is, in the absence of explicit consent to be responsible for the kid (with marriage being considered explicit consent), the woman can retain total control AND total responsibility for what comes out of her body.

Within marriage, abortion without husband's consent would be considered to trigger dissolution of the marriage for cause, without alimony.

48 posted on 09/03/2009 5:17:53 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Public healthcare looks like it will work as well as public housing did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson