Haven’t read the full article. On the surface, it does sound like the idea (if it were real) would have been for Bristol to give birth privately, and then for the Palins to adopt their grandchild anonymously. Not so whacked out as to sound impossible for a political grandmom and mom in a fix. Fits with her having kept her own pregnancy quiet for so long.
Damaging insofar as politicians are supposed to be quasi-open books re: their families, and in an odd way almost heroic and an all-round solution. But the story could hurt Sarah, I’d imagine, and it’s good that it’s only coming for an in-the-tank, paid, characterless twit with so little credibility.
If anything, everything we know or hear even rumored about her suggests someone acting on high principle, but sometimes at the cost of leaving a opening for criticism.
On the other hand, could very well be (more likely) entirely made up and put into the twit’s mind by those looking for an outrageous and false story to discredit her. We know that’s been going on in spades, and that such operators have a thorough hold on Levi.
Given the obviously false lies that have been repeatedly generated about her, I’m perfectly fine with guessing this fits into that category, ignoring it, and moving right by without further comment. In fact, I feel like washing my eyeballs off after just reading the blurb posted here.
You are as bad as the far left. Bristol's pregnancy was well known in Alaska so that is idiotic to think she could "privately" deliver, Palin never hid her pregnancy and you really think that it isn't leftist silliness to think that a 44 year old sitting Governor with five kids would find and adopt a rare, white, newborn, out of the blue immediately after delivering her own Down syndrome newborn?