[Jedidah]

Here’s the theory, which is supported by logistics of Stanley Ann or Sr. (documentation or witness reports): The trip from Honolulu to Kenya would have been in late 1960 or very early 1961, early pregnancy, during Stanley Ann’s missing months. The marriage takes place in Kenya and she stays with Sr.’s family till after the birth while he returns to Hawaii to school. The Seattle appearance is on her return trip with the baby, late August 1961. She subsequently enrolls in extension courses at U of W that fall and on-campus classes the following spring (U of W transcripts, and her name and address listed in city directories).

How does “any of this support the birther argument”? I don’t know that it does, and that’s not what most of us are interested in. There are big questions about the man in the oval office, and we just want answers, wherever they lead us.

If you really do have “curiousity,” you should take time to go back and read the long threads.

[curiosity]

Here’s the theory, which is supported by logistics of Stanley Ann or Sr. (documentation or witness reports): The trip from Honolulu to Kenya would have been in late 1960 or very early 1961, early pregnancy, during Stanley Ann’s missing months.

Okay, and where's the evidence she travelled to Kenya? For what plausible reason would she travel there?

As far as I can see, there is none.

[El Gato]

How does “any of this support the birther argument”? I don’t know that it does

It does if it shows a birth in Kenya!. That being the whole point of the "birth certificate" wing of the Birther Nation. :)

[Frantzie]

So she has the baby in Kenya. S upposedly the vibes in KEnya are not good. She flies BOAC to London then Glasgow Scotland?? Then NY to Seattle. Seattle to HI.

Or BOAC from London to Canada???