Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China warns banks on OTC hedge defaults (will default on derivitives if it wants to)
reuters ^ | Sat Aug 29, 2009

Posted on 09/01/2009 3:33:20 AM PDT by dennisw

Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs) may unilaterally terminate derivative contracts with six foreign banks that provide over-the-counter commodity hedging services, a leading financial magazine said.

China's SOE regulator, the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (SASAC), had told the financial institutions that SOEs reserved the right to default on contracts, Caijing magazine quoted an unnamed industry source as saying.

It did not name the banks or the firms in question, but said Keith Noyes, an official with the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, had confirmed he was aware of the letter to the banks. He declined to comment further to Caijing.

It also cited a SASAC official as saying that almost every SOE involved in foreign exchange or trade had some exposure to derivatives such as crude oil, non-ferrous metals, agricultural commodities, iron ore and coal, although only 31 SOEs were licensed to do so.

Nobody at SASAC was immediately available to comment on Saturday.

SASAC took over the job of overseeing SOEs' derivatives trading from the securities regulator in February after several Chinese firms reported huge losses from derivatives, and quickly tightened the rules, ordering firms to quit risky contracts and report their positions on a quarterly basis.

In January, Air China (601111.SS: Quote, Profile, Research) (0753.HK: Quote, Profile, Research), Shanghai Airlines (600591.SS: Quote, Profile, Research) and China Eastern (600115.SS: Quote, Profile, Research) reported book losses of almost $2 billion on aviation fuel hedging contracts, the official Xinhua news agency said at the time.

For more details on China's derivatives regulation, please click on: [ID:nPEK207347]

(Excerpt) Read more at in.reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china

1 posted on 09/01/2009 3:33:20 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dennisw

http://forums.silverseek.com/showthread.php?p=68753

MORE--->>>

From Jim Sinclair:

Dear Comrades In Golden Arms,

China tells the Wall Street OTC derivative manufacturers and distributors to go straight to hell.

China has invoked a "Stop Loss" on these fraud ridden instruments.

If you create a specific performance contract that you know under even the slightest pressure cannot perform, you have committed fraud.

My English bull dog Mia, bless her soul, figured out the non-performance characteristics of these financial WMDs.

This will have a MAJOR impact on the sociopath US manufacturers and distributors of OTC derivatives like CDSs that struck the world over with these weapons of mass financial destruction.

This could roll the financial world one more time.

Doing the right thing is never easy. Doing the right thing takes character and courage.

The Chinese are doing exactly the right thing and exactly what the West should have done years ago when long term capital flopped.

Now the rest of the BRIC nations will follow suit.

China's actions here are another reason why China is headed for the largest economy on the planet.

While the West enriches the creators of this disaster, China herein tells them, to go straight to hell, and that they will not get their money to enrich themselves more. China has invoked a "Stop Loss."

Here is an example of how China will act with regards to the dollar late this fall. You can take that to the bank if you can find a solvent one in the USA, GB or Euroland.

The Wall Street types who are talking heads surmise that China thinks and will act like the Wall Street Weenies. They are so very WRONG.

Screw with China and you will get bitten in the ass by a real dragon. China leads the BRICs.

This will have a MAJOR impact on the sociopath USA manufacturers and distributors of OTC derivatives that struck the world over with these weapons of mass financial destruction, enriching themselves in the process by many trillions.

If China's banks were the losers on these instruments then the winners, now not getting paid, are the sociopath USA manufacturers and distributors of OTC derivatives. These instruments were not created between Chinese banks, but made and packaged primarily in the good old US of A. Think it out. This is a stop loss for the Chinese.

I was correct 10 years ago when people denigrated me. I am correct on the price of gold as people still denigrate me.

I will have the last word with all these jealous fools.

Respectfully yours,
Jim


2 posted on 09/01/2009 3:35:08 AM PDT by dennisw (Free Republic is an island in a sea of zombies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Obama has shown that contracts mean nothing when it is for his benefit. China says “we can play that game also.”

I thought most of these were marketed from London so as to escape the fairly weak regulation in place in the USA?


3 posted on 09/01/2009 3:42:43 AM PDT by listenhillary (We became community organizers and Obama and the Statists get p*ssed off at us?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

yep


4 posted on 09/01/2009 3:43:31 AM PDT by WorkerbeeCitizen (The only time I want a Republican reaching across the aisle is to smack a liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

We’ll fix those mean ol’ Chinese - we’ll just stop borrowing from ‘em....

Riiight.....


5 posted on 09/01/2009 3:47:30 AM PDT by Uncle Ike (Rope is cheap, and there are lots of trees...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Going forward, foreign banks may refuse to do derivatives deals where China is a counterparty. This is real money the banks are losing, because they typically hedge by doing some other trades to cover their risk. In essence, they are more or less doing these deals for a fee, and haven’t factored into the deals the risk of default. Hedging’s about to get extremely expensive for Chinese SOE’s, if they can anybody to take the other side of the bet at all.


6 posted on 09/01/2009 3:59:55 AM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
China's SOE regulator, the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (SASAC), had told the financial institutions that SOEs reserved the right to default on contracts, Caijing magazine quoted an unnamed industry source as saying.

Red China is a large and arrogant totalitarian state. Trying to do business with such an entity as if it were just another nation is foolishness beyond belief. They have sold us poisonous foods; they proclaim their willingness to renege at will on contracts; they prop up other disgusting totalitarian states such as North Korea and Burma.

We should have long ago ceased all normal trading relationships with the PRC. Unfortunately, with the Kenyan Clown and his red circus running things, we will undoubtedly do nothing except entangle ourselves more with this disgusting state.

7 posted on 09/01/2009 4:01:32 AM PDT by snowsislander (NRA -- join today! 1-877-NRA-2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

The Chinese have figured out that dealing with folks who have a gambling addiction is not good business.


8 posted on 09/01/2009 4:23:55 AM PDT by wolfcreek (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

I like what the Chinese are doing. They are calling out the derivatives makers and dealers. The Chinese will still be able to hedge real commodities which is what they really want. I mean gold silver oil copper and foodstuffs. I have nothing against futures contracts

But financial derivatives (such as credit default swaps) are BS and the Chinese are saying so


9 posted on 09/01/2009 4:33:06 AM PDT by dennisw (Free Republic is an island in a sea of zombies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
I believe these are commodity contracts:

Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs) may unilaterally terminate derivative contracts with six foreign banks that provide over-the-counter commodity hedging services, a leading financial magazine said. ... It also cited a SASAC official as saying that almost every SOE involved in foreign exchange or trade had some exposure to derivatives such as crude oil, non-ferrous metals, agricultural commodities, iron ore and coal, although only 31 SOEs were licensed to do so.

10 posted on 09/01/2009 5:18:32 AM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

they’ll do so...if Obammy and Timmy meet their prices....


11 posted on 09/01/2009 5:20:25 AM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

I can only guess that these are not straight forward commodity futures contracts as we know them. These are complicated derivatives layered on top of them.

I wish I knew more
Because China wants to use futures markets for its commodity plays. The BRIC nations have been railing against our (USA) financial gamesmanship....saying it has put the world economy in danger. This is what I see here. China rebelling against complex derivatives and the wise guys who make money off them


12 posted on 09/01/2009 7:15:29 AM PDT by dennisw (Free Republic is an island in a sea of zombies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

I agree with this guy. China might burn some derivatives players-—>>

http://market-ticker.denninger.net/archives/1393-ROFL!-China-Tells-IBs-Stuff-It!.html


13 posted on 09/01/2009 7:23:30 AM PDT by dennisw (Free Republic is an island in a sea of zombies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

This is significant. Some Chinese co’s must be hugely underwater on certain contracts. Meaning GS or MS or whoever may not get paid.


14 posted on 09/02/2009 12:39:14 PM PDT by spyone (ridiculum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson