Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scarborough: Did Obama sign off on the Lockerbie bomber’s release ?
Hot Air ^ | August 31, 2009 | ALLAHPUNDIT

Posted on 08/31/2009 5:37:47 PM PDT by RobinMasters

Via Mediaite. I’m guessing the answer is no, for the simple reason that The One gets nothing from doing so except a pounding political headache. Why would he okay it given the suspicions that he’s soft on terror?

A better question: If he didn’t sign off, do the Brits have little so esteem for him that they’d do the deal anyway? Frum wonders.

We do know that the British kept the U.S. briefed well enough for American diplomats to protest the looming U.K./Scottish decision. At the same time, we read in the British press that U.S. officials indicated that they preferred a humanitarian release to a prisoner transfer.

Those reports raise further questions:

Exactly how vigorously did the Obama administration protest? Why did those protests produce so little result? Do British/Scots feel so little regard for the new Obama administration that they ignore its strong complaints? Or were complaints possibly less than strong? After all, a complaint in the form, “We don’t want you to do X, but if you must do X, we prefer that you do it in the following way…” does not constitute a very resounding warning.

If the U.S. complaints about the decision to release were as weak as reported, why were they so weak? Many in the intelligence community have long doubted that the Libyans were in fact responsible for the Lockerbie bombing. Serious people have argued for 20 years that the attack originated in Syria and Iran. Does Secretary of State Hillary Clinton share those doubts?

(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 08/31/2009 5:37:47 PM PDT by RobinMasters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

If we could prove it though,OH BABY!


2 posted on 08/31/2009 5:42:20 PM PDT by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Barry better be daily praying to whomever that he had no involvment or gave any type “OK” on this...and it is exposed by a reputable news media source/outlet.


3 posted on 08/31/2009 5:42:44 PM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Would they have released him if W was President? Hmmm?


4 posted on 08/31/2009 5:42:48 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Health Care Reform has met the DEATH Panel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Scarbourgh = Blind squirrel = Found some...


5 posted on 08/31/2009 5:45:21 PM PDT by tubebender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

It would not have been doen without Washington approval or instigation.


6 posted on 08/31/2009 5:47:32 PM PDT by arthurus ("If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, don't shoot an abortionist." -Ann C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

7 posted on 08/31/2009 5:48:20 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson