Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rasmussen: 57% Would Like to Replace Entire Congress
Rasmussen Reports ^ | Aug 30, 2009 | Rasmussen

Posted on 08/30/2009 4:57:55 AM PDT by VRWCTexan

If they could vote to keep or replace the entire Congress, just 25% of voters nationwide would keep the current batch of legislators.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 57% would vote to replace the entire Congress and start all over again

(Excerpt) Read more at rasmussenreports.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 111th; 2009polls; 2010midterms; bhojobapproval; rasmussen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last
To: PIF

Amazingly the very peak of civilization was reached in Zimbabwe ~ and then they threw it all away.


81 posted on 08/30/2009 8:55:35 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: DYngbld

BRAVO!!! TERM LIMITS are words worth repeating. Join the National Term Limits Movement.


82 posted on 08/30/2009 8:55:59 AM PDT by Postman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Never come back:
83 posted on 08/30/2009 8:57:01 AM PDT by org.whodat (Vote: Chuck De Vore in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

84 posted on 08/30/2009 8:59:52 AM PDT by org.whodat (Vote: Chuck De Vore in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: ecomcon

I agree, Bill Ayers should be in jail


85 posted on 08/30/2009 9:31:57 AM PDT by Military family member (GO Colts!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Walrus
Au contraire This is NOT a "non-thinking kneejerk response." Yes, there IS a "gaggle of good Republican legislators", but there are also literally thousands of equally good men and women in every state who could replace them.

Yes, but if this gaggle of present legislators is already good, then why on earth would we want to replace them? That's just plain bad sense. Any business organisation worth its salt would laugh at the idea of replacing good workers with more experience with a bunch of young pups who, while perhaps also being good workers, don't have the knowledge to get things done as well. Most businesses that do that end up having problems.

The wish to replace the whole of Congress reflects a loathing of the corruption of incumbency, rather than a rejection of any particular political philosophy.

Which is....a non-thinking, knee-jerk response. When you vote based on loathing instead of thinking about practical and philosophical reasons, then it becomes a matter of brute emotion. This is further compounded by the fact that the instant you elect somebody, they automatically become an incumbent, and hence are just as susceptible to the "corruption of incumbency" as was the gang you just voted out.

86 posted on 08/30/2009 9:39:32 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (We bury Democrats face down so that when they scratch, they get closer to home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

Enemys Foriegn and DOMESTIC!


87 posted on 08/30/2009 9:50:33 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Crazy, right? And that was before Europeans showed up to wreak everything!


88 posted on 08/30/2009 10:36:06 AM PDT by PIF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: VRWCTexan

Only 57%? I’m stunned.


89 posted on 08/30/2009 10:38:12 AM PDT by GOPJ (Socialism : Envy gussied up as a political cause...... David Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

In Japan for first time in 40 years the Liberal Dems were swept from office in a landslide - people were fed up - could happen here in 2010


90 posted on 08/30/2009 10:43:14 AM PDT by VRWCTexan (Obama-scare is the "real" Cash for Clunker Program!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: VRWCTexan
In Japan for first time in 40 years the Liberal Dems were swept from office in a landslide - people were fed up - could happen here in 2010

I think it will happen. People are getting scared of dem extremism.

91 posted on 08/30/2009 10:47:30 AM PDT by GOPJ (Socialism : Envy gussied up as a political cause...... David Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: VRWCTexan

Methinks what the winning party will find out is that it’s a lot easier to be the opposition and complain about everything.

Now they actually have to govern, and that’s a whole other kettle of fish.


92 posted on 08/30/2009 10:47:39 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan
That’s so disturbing.

Yeah well, if clothes make the man...

heh,heh

93 posted on 08/30/2009 11:26:59 AM PDT by ForGod'sSake (You have two choices and two choices only: SUBMIT or RESIST with everything you've got!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake

I can’t keep the third- and fourth-generation Kennedys straight.


94 posted on 08/30/2009 11:38:44 AM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: VRWCTexan
A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 57% would vote to replace the entire Congress and start all over again

Sounds like a plan.

I seriously believe that, within the next four-six years, this will come to pass - one way, or another.

Obama is not the disease - he's a symptom.

95 posted on 08/30/2009 11:43:19 AM PDT by Jim Noble (I hope Sarah will start a 2nd party soon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCTexan
57% Would Like to Replace Entire Congress

Good, about 57% of Congress needs to be replaced.

96 posted on 08/30/2009 12:38:42 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (RATs, nothing more than bald haired hippies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCTexan

A Humble prediction:

In that face of this discontent, only 93% of incumbent conresscritters will be returned to fleece us instead of the usual 98%. The Soviet Politburo had more turnover.

Why? Because people won’t vote against THEIR congressman as long as the checks keep flowing into the home district.

PJ O’Rourke was half right — yes we do have a Parliament of Whores, representing an electorate of whores.


97 posted on 08/30/2009 1:19:24 PM PDT by crusher (Political Correctness: Stalinism Without the Charm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan
I can’t keep the third- and fourth-generation Kennedys straight.

Heh. FYI, an excerpt from this interesting ARTICLE

This is most easily seen in the children of wealthy parents. Successful businessmen, for example, who have made it on their own normally have a respect for the effort and the economic system that makes success possible.

Their children, who have not had to work for it, are easier targets for guilt-mongering by the envious. So they assume a posture of liberal compassion as an envy-deflection device: "Please don't envy me for my father's money -- look at all the liberal causes and government social programs I advocate!"

Teddy Kennedy is the archetype of this phenomenon.

This is also why Hollywood is so liberal. The vast amounts of money movie stars make is so grossly disproportionate to the effort it took them to make it that they feel it is unearned. So they apologize for it. The liberal's strategy is to apologize for his success in order to appease the envious.

98 posted on 08/30/2009 4:03:25 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (You have two choices and two choices only: SUBMIT or RESIST with everything you've got!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: VRWCTexan
The members of Congress in particular who should go are members of the Progressive Caucus.

Congressional Progressive Caucus

There is not a good one on that list! Then the associated Senators should go as well.

99 posted on 08/30/2009 9:07:38 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake

Without actually engaqing in charitable activity. Cf. Gore’s and other Democrats’ double-digit charitable giving.


100 posted on 08/30/2009 11:01:06 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson